Analytical Shifts in Contemporary Literary Studies: From Digital Humanities to New Directions in Indonesian Literature

Andri Wicaksono, Dany Ardhian, Sultan Tirta Mujtaba

Abstract


Contemporary literary studies are undergoing significant analytical transformations alongside the increasing use of computational methods and digital humanities. This article aims to examine the epistemological tensions emerging from these transformations and to formulate a critical analytical framework for contemporary literary studies. The study employs a critical literature review combining narrative and systematic review approaches. Data were collected from academic publications indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and major academic publishers focusing on digital humanities, distant reading, critical digital studies, representation theory, and intertextuality. The collected data were analyzed through critical interpretation and thematic synthesis to identify major conceptual debates and methodological tendencies. The study finds that computational literary approaches expand the scale of textual exploration but also risk reducing literary meaning into statistical abstraction and reproducing representational bias when detached from critical reflection. Based on these findings, the article proposes a layered critical analytical model integrating computational exploration, hermeneutic interpretation, and critical reflection. The framework is further contextualized within Indonesian literary studies characterized by multilingualism, digital literary practices, and diverse cultural traditions. This study contributes to the development of contemporary literary studies by offering an integrative framework that connects scale, interpretation, and power relations in the digital era.

Abstrak
Kajian sastra kontemporer mengalami transformasi analitik yang signifikan seiring meningkatnya penggunaan metode komputasional dan humaniora digital. Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji ketegangan epistemologis yang muncul dari transformasi tersebut serta merumuskan kerangka analitik kritis bagi kajian sastra kontemporer. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka kritis yang mengombinasikan pendekatan narrative review dan systematic synthesis. Data penelitian diperoleh dari publikasi akademik yang terindeks Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, serta berbagai penerbit akademik utama yang membahas humaniora digital, distant reading, kajian digital kritis, teori representasi, dan intertekstualitas. Data dianalisis melalui interpretasi kritis dan sintesis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi perdebatan konseptual dan kecenderungan metodologis utama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan komputasional dalam kajian sastra mampu memperluas skala eksplorasi teks, tetapi juga berisiko mereduksi makna sastra menjadi abstraksi statistik dan mereproduksi bias representasi apabila tidak disertai refleksi kritis. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, artikel ini mengajukan model analitik kritis berlapis yang mengintegrasikan eksplorasi komputasional, interpretasi hermeneutik, dan refleksi kritis. Kerangka ini kemudian dikontekstualisasikan dalam kajian sastra Indonesia yang bercirikan multibahasa, praktik sastra digital, dan keragaman tradisi budaya. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan kajian sastra kontemporer melalui kerangka integratif yang menghubungkan skala, interpretasi, dan relasi kuasa di era digital.

Keywords


digital humanities; distant reading; critical literary analytics; literary studies; Indonesian literature

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berry, D. M., & Fagerjord, A. (2017). Digital humanities: Knowledge and critique in a digital age. Polity Press.

Birnbaum, D. J., Bonde, S., & Kestemont, M. (2017). The digital middle ages: An introduction. Speculum, 92(S1), S1–S38. https://doi.org/10.1086/694236

Brooks, C. (1947). The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. Harcourt, Brace & World.

Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., & Schnapp, J. (2012). Digital humanities. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9248.001.0001

CATMA Project. (2025). CATMA: Computer-Assisted Text Markup and Analysis.

Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.

Da, N. Z. (2019). The computational case against computational literary studies. Critical Inquiry, 45(3), 601–639. https://doi.org/10.1086/702594

Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html

Duan, S. (2025). Quantitative intertextuality from the digital humanities perspective: A survey. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27045

Fiormonte, D. (2017). Digital humanities and the geopolitics of knowledge. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, 7. https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.274

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method. Continuum.

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.

Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.

Hidayatullah, A. F., Apong, R. A., Lai, D. T. C., & Qazi, A. (2023). Corpus creation and language identification for code-mixed Indonesian-Javanese-English tweets. PeerJ. Computer Science, 9, 1—22. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1312

Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press.

Kempeneer, S. (2021). A big data state of mind: Epistemological challenges to accountability and transparency in data-driven regulation. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 1—8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101578

Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.

Liu, A. (2013). The meaning of the digital humanities. PMLA, 128(2), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.409

Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought, and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275

Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.

O’Sullivan, J. (2022). The Bloomsbury handbook to the digital humanities. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rahardjanto, A., Husamah, Hudha, A. M., & Permana, T. I. (2025). Ecocultural practices in East Java, Indonesia: A hermeneutic phenomenological study on “Reresik Kali” as local wisdom for river conservation. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102176

Risam, R. (2019). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.

Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (2016). A new companion to digital humanities. Wiley-Blackwell.

Shofiyuddin, H. (2025). Bridging literature and technology: The strategic role of digital humanities in humanities studies. In S. I. Sa’adah (Ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Islamic Civilization and Humanities (pp. 1378–1384). Faculty of Adab and Humanities, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya. https://proceedings.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/iconfahum/article/view/3370

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

The Programming Historian. (2022). Programming historian. https://programminghistorian.org/

Turnbull, Jonathon, Searle, Adam, Hartman Davies, Oscar, Dodsworth, Jennifer, Chasseray-Peraldi, Pauline, von Essen, Erica, & Anderson-Elliott, Henry. (2023). Digital ecologies: Materialities, encounters, governance. Progress in Environmental Geography, 2(1–2), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687221145698

Underwood, T. (2019). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. University of Chicago Press.

Wang, L., & Chen, T. (2024). Digital methods in literary criticism: A review of digital humanities and literary studies. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.63744/8n3pryacpah4

Yuan, C., Mamat, R., Azidan, M., Jabar, A., & Qingyan, X. U. E. (2025). An exploration of multimodal intertextuality and persuasion based on beauty influencer advertising in social media. Akademika, 95(October), 77–95.

Zahra, R. M. (2024). Digital humanities approaches to analyzing Indonesian language texts as non-Western languages. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), 787–795.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v15i1.8545

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 JENTERA: Jurnal Kajian Sastra

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Jentera Indexed By

DOAJSINTAGoogle ScholarPKP IndexcrossrefDimensionsPKP IndexEBSCO Information ServicescilitMorarefSHERPA / RomeoEBSCO Information ServiceOCLC World Cat BASETROVEGARUDAColumbia University Libraries

 

 

 

 Creative Commons License  

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Jentera: Jurnal Kajian Sastra diterbitkan oleh Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa bekerja sama dengan Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurna Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya (PPJB-SIP)

 

@2017 

Gedung Darma, Lantai 3, Ruang Peneliti

Pusat Pengembangan dan Pelindungan

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Jalan Daksinapati Barat IV, Rawamangun, Jakarta Timur

View My Stats