Analytical Shifts in Contemporary Literary Studies: From Digital Humanities to New Directions in Indonesian Literature
Abstract
Abstrak
Kajian sastra kontemporer mengalami transformasi analitik yang signifikan seiring meningkatnya penggunaan metode komputasional dan humaniora digital. Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji ketegangan epistemologis yang muncul dari transformasi tersebut serta merumuskan kerangka analitik kritis bagi kajian sastra kontemporer. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka kritis yang mengombinasikan pendekatan narrative review dan systematic synthesis. Data penelitian diperoleh dari publikasi akademik yang terindeks Scopus, Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, serta berbagai penerbit akademik utama yang membahas humaniora digital, distant reading, kajian digital kritis, teori representasi, dan intertekstualitas. Data dianalisis melalui interpretasi kritis dan sintesis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi perdebatan konseptual dan kecenderungan metodologis utama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan komputasional dalam kajian sastra mampu memperluas skala eksplorasi teks, tetapi juga berisiko mereduksi makna sastra menjadi abstraksi statistik dan mereproduksi bias representasi apabila tidak disertai refleksi kritis. Berdasarkan temuan tersebut, artikel ini mengajukan model analitik kritis berlapis yang mengintegrasikan eksplorasi komputasional, interpretasi hermeneutik, dan refleksi kritis. Kerangka ini kemudian dikontekstualisasikan dalam kajian sastra Indonesia yang bercirikan multibahasa, praktik sastra digital, dan keragaman tradisi budaya. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan kajian sastra kontemporer melalui kerangka integratif yang menghubungkan skala, interpretasi, dan relasi kuasa di era digital.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Berry, D. M., & Fagerjord, A. (2017). Digital humanities: Knowledge and critique in a digital age. Polity Press.
Birnbaum, D. J., Bonde, S., & Kestemont, M. (2017). The digital middle ages: An introduction. Speculum, 92(S1), S1–S38. https://doi.org/10.1086/694236
Brooks, C. (1947). The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Burdick, A., Drucker, J., Lunenfeld, P., Presner, T., & Schnapp, J. (2012). Digital humanities. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9248.001.0001
CATMA Project. (2025). CATMA: Computer-Assisted Text Markup and Analysis.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Princeton University Press.
Da, N. Z. (2019). The computational case against computational literary studies. Critical Inquiry, 45(3), 601–639. https://doi.org/10.1086/702594
Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html
Duan, S. (2025). Quantitative intertextuality from the digital humanities perspective: A survey. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27045
Fiormonte, D. (2017). Digital humanities and the geopolitics of knowledge. Digital Studies/Le Champ Numérique, 7. https://doi.org/10.16995/dscn.274
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method. Continuum.
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage.
Hayles, N. K. (2008). Electronic literature: New horizons for the literary. University of Notre Dame Press.
Hidayatullah, A. F., Apong, R. A., Lai, D. T. C., & Qazi, A. (2023). Corpus creation and language identification for code-mixed Indonesian-Javanese-English tweets. PeerJ. Computer Science, 9, 1—22. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1312
Jockers, M. L. (2013). Macroanalysis: Digital methods and literary history. University of Illinois Press.
Kempeneer, S. (2021). A big data state of mind: Epistemological challenges to accountability and transparency in data-driven regulation. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 1—8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101578
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art. Columbia University Press.
Liu, A. (2013). The meaning of the digital humanities. PMLA, 128(2), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2013.128.2.409
Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought, and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409349275
Moretti, F. (2013). Distant reading. Verso.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.
O’Sullivan, J. (2022). The Bloomsbury handbook to the digital humanities. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., & Bossuyt, P. M. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Rahardjanto, A., Husamah, Hudha, A. M., & Permana, T. I. (2025). Ecocultural practices in East Java, Indonesia: A hermeneutic phenomenological study on “Reresik Kali” as local wisdom for river conservation. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102176
Risam, R. (2019). New digital worlds: Postcolonial digital humanities in theory, praxis, and pedagogy. Northwestern University Press.
Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., & Unsworth, J. (2016). A new companion to digital humanities. Wiley-Blackwell.
Shofiyuddin, H. (2025). Bridging literature and technology: The strategic role of digital humanities in humanities studies. In S. I. Sa’adah (Ed.), Proceedings of International Conference on Islamic Civilization and Humanities (pp. 1378–1384). Faculty of Adab and Humanities, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya. https://proceedings.uinsa.ac.id/index.php/iconfahum/article/view/3370
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
The Programming Historian. (2022). Programming historian. https://programminghistorian.org/
Turnbull, Jonathon, Searle, Adam, Hartman Davies, Oscar, Dodsworth, Jennifer, Chasseray-Peraldi, Pauline, von Essen, Erica, & Anderson-Elliott, Henry. (2023). Digital ecologies: Materialities, encounters, governance. Progress in Environmental Geography, 2(1–2), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/27539687221145698
Underwood, T. (2019). Distant horizons: Digital evidence and literary change. University of Chicago Press.
Wang, L., & Chen, T. (2024). Digital methods in literary criticism: A review of digital humanities and literary studies. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.63744/8n3pryacpah4
Yuan, C., Mamat, R., Azidan, M., Jabar, A., & Qingyan, X. U. E. (2025). An exploration of multimodal intertextuality and persuasion based on beauty influencer advertising in social media. Akademika, 95(October), 77–95.
Zahra, R. M. (2024). Digital humanities approaches to analyzing Indonesian language texts as non-Western languages. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(4), 787–795.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jentera.v15i1.8545
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 JENTERA: Jurnal Kajian Sastra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jentera: Jurnal Kajian Sastra diterbitkan oleh Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa bekerja sama dengan Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurna Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya (PPJB-SIP)
@2017
Gedung Darma, Lantai 3, Ruang Peneliti
Pusat Pengembangan dan Pelindungan
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Jalan Daksinapati Barat IV, Rawamangun, Jakarta Timur





















