Analisis Bahasa Sindiran dalam Debat: Studi Kasus Debat Pertama Capres Indonesia Tahun 2024

Rizka Adinda, Mariyadi Mariyadi

Abstract


Sarcasm is a way of conveying meaning or messages through humorous or figurative insinuations and harsh criticism, including during the Indonesia’s 2024 presidential debate. Therefore, this study aims to reveal the application and meaning of sarcasm in the first 2024 presidential debate. The study adopts a descriptive qualitative research design. The data in this study are sourced from video recordings of the first 2024 presidential debate on YouTube. This study utilizes data in the form of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and discourse containing sarcasm obtained through the note-taking technique. The collected data were then analyzed based on the data analysis technique guidelines of Miles and Huberman (1994) to identify the forms of language style through the analysis process with the following stages; 1) data collection on the aspects of sarcasm, 2) data reduction by sorting the data to be analyzed, 3) presenting data in tables, and 4) drawing conclusions/verification from the analysis as findings. The results of this study found that there are styles of sarcasm, namely innuendo, irony, and cynicism, by looking at the meaning in the words of the 2024 presidential debate speakers. The styles of innuendo and irony are the most dominant types of sarcasm that appear in the results of this study.

Abstrak
Sindiran menjadi suatu cara dalam menyampaikan makna atau pesan dengan menyindir baik secara lucu atau kias dan kritik pedas termasuk saat debat Capres Indonesia 2024. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengungkap pengaplikasian dan makna sindiran pada debat pertama Capres 2024. Penelitian mengadopsi jenis penelitian kualitatif deskriptif. Data dalam penelitian ini bersumber dari rekaman video debat pertama Capres 2024 pada kanal YouTube. Penelitian ini memanfaatkan data berupa kata, frasa, klausa, kalimat dan wacana yang terkandung sindiran melalui teknik simak catat. Data-data yang telah dikumpulkan kemudian dianalisis berdasarkan panduan teknik analisis data model Miles dan Huberman (1994) untuk menemukan bentuk-bentuk gaya bahasa melalui proses analisis dengan tingkatan; 1) pengumpulan data berupa aspek sindiran, 2) reduksi data dengan memilah data yang akan dianalisis, 3) penyajian data dalam tabel, dan 4) penarikan kesimpulan/verifikasi dari analisis sebagai hasil temuan. Hasil penelitian ini menemukan terdapat gaya bahasa sindiran yaitu gaya bahasa sindiran innuendo, ironi, dan sinisme dengan melihat makna dalam kata-kata penutur debat Capres 2024. Gaya bahasa sindiran innuendo dan ironi merupakan jenis sindiran yang paling dominan muncul dalam hasil penelitian.

Keywords


kampanye politik; sindiran; bahasa; gaya bahasa; debat calon presiden 2024

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ackeren, M. J. van. (2016). Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1402–1410. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw062

Airaksinen, T. (2020). Irony and Sarcasm in Ethical Perspective. Open Philosophy, 3(1), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0132

Akimoto, Y. (2014). Irony comprehension: Social conceptual knowledge and emotional response. Human Brain Mapping, 35(4), 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22242

Alabi, O. S. (2021). An exploration into the satiric significance of abuse in selected Nigerian drama. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, 35, 143–162. https://doi.org/10.14198/raei.2021.35.07

Aljanabi, A. Q. N. (2024). A forensic pragmatic analysis of defamatory statements in Iraqi criminal courts. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.59400/fls.v6i2.1879

Anshari, F., & Hafiz, A. (2018). Konferensi Nasional Komunikasi. 02.

Au-Yeung, S. K. (2015). Processing of Written Irony in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Eye-Movement Study. Autism Research, 8(6), 749–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.1490

Azhari, T., & Septyanti, E. (2023). Gaya Bahasa Satire dalam Talkshow Mata Najwa “Jenaka di Negeri Opera.” 05(04).

Benwell, B. (2007). New sexism?: Readers’ responses to the use of irony in men’s magazines. Journalism Studies, 8(4), 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701411797

Bosco, C., Patti, V., & Bolioli, A. (2013). Developing Corpora for Sentiment Analysis: The Case of Irony and Senti-TUT. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2013.28

Bosco, F. M. (2017). Neural correlates underlying the comprehension of deceitful and ironic communicative intentions. Cortex, 94(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.010

Bosco, F. M. (2018). Do executive function and theory of mind predict pragmatic abilities following traumatic brain injury? An analysis of sincere, deceitful and ironic communicative acts. Journal of Communication Disorders, 75(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2018.05.002

Bowes, A., & Katz, A. (2011). When Sarcasm Stings. Discourse Processes, 48(4), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2010.532757

Busairi, M. (2022). GAYA BAHASA SINDIRAN DALAM INSTAGRAM KOMIK KITA: KAJIAN STILISTIKA. MABASAN, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Cheang, H. (2009). Acoustic markers of sarcasm in Cantonese and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1394–1405. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3177275

Cignarella, A. T. (2018). Overview of the EVALita 2018 task on irony detection in Italian tweets (IRONITA). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2263(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33). https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.4470

Dash, S. (2022). Insights Into Incitement: A Computational Perspective on Dangerous Speech on Twitter in India. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Query date: 2024-05-14 21:15:51, 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530190.3534800

Demina, O. V. (2021). Linguistic and Stylistic Means of Satire Construction in the Animated Series1. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics, 12(4), 1124–1146. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-4-1124-1146

Devi, Y., Malik, A., & Elfitra, L. (2021). GAYA BAHASA SINDIRAN DALAM ACARA INDONESIA LAWYERS CLUB (ILC) DI TV ONE EPISODE JANUARI-APRIL 2020. Student Online Journal (SOJ) UMRAH …, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Eviatar, Z. (2006). Brain correlates of discourse processing: An fMRI investigation of irony and conventional metaphor comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 44(12), 2348–2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.007

Faber, P. (2016). Specialized knowledge representation and the parameterization of context. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00196

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. 21(1).

Faŕias, D. I. H. (2016). Irony detection in twitter: The role of affective content. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1145/2930663

Farmida, S., Ediwarman, E., & ... (2021). Analisis Satire Dan Sarkasme Dalam Debat Capres 2019 Dan Implementasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Di SMA. … Bahasa Dan Sastra …, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Ghosh, A. (2015). SemEval-2015 Task 11: Sentiment Analysis of Figurative Language in Twitter. SemEval 2015 - 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, Co-Located with the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2015 - Proceedings, Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33, 470–478.

Gibbs, Jr, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139168779

Gibbs, R. (2000). Irony in Talk Among Friends. Metaphor and Symbol, 15(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS151&2_2

Glucksberg, S. (2001). Understanding Figurative Language. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195111095.001.0001

Gorys Keraf, D. (2009). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2zm9pAbUHP8C

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003

Hernández-Farías, I. (2015). Applying basic features from sentiment analysis for automatic irony detection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 9117(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33), 337–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19390-8_38

Heru, A. (2018). GAYA BAHASA SINDIRAN IRONI, SINISME DAN SARKASME DALAM BERITA UTAMA HARIAN KOMPAS Oleh. 8(2).

Iskandar, F. (2020). Analisis Wacana Politik Debat Publik Calon Presiden dan Calon Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social …, Query date: 2024-03-25 00:32:35.

Jum’ati, N., & Pd, M. (2020). Gaya Bahasa Sindiran dalam Kumpulan Cerpen Karya Lu Xun《 故事新编》. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Mandarin …, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Kalandadze, T. (2018). Figurative language comprehension in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analytic review. Autism, 22(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361316668652

Kurniawati, W., Ekoyanantiasih, R., Yulianti, S., Hardaniawati, M., Sasangka, S. W., & Firdaus, W. (2022). Kekuasaan Semantik dalam Analisis Wacana Kritis Debat Capres-Cawapres. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 165-179.

Lamarre, H. L. (2009). The irony of satire: Political ideology and the motivation to see what you want to see in the Colbert report. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208330904

Lande, E., Salem, L., & Wastiningsih, A. (2018). GAYA BAHASA DALAM NOVEL AYAH KARYA ANDREA HIRATA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan …, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Leech, G. N., & Oka, M. D. D. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Universitas Indonesia.

Mahajani, T., Chodijah, S., Ekowati, A., & ... (2023). Analysis Of Satirical Language Style In Poetry Collection Malu (Aku) Jadi Orang Indonesia By Taufiq Ismail And Implications For Indonesian Language Learning In …. JHSS (JOURNAL OF …, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Mardiatussaadah, E., Maspuroh, U., & Sutri. (2024). Gaya Bahasa Ironi, Sinisme, Dan Sarkasme Pada Kolom Komentar Instagram @Mgdalenaf. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10466389

Maya, R. (2021). GAYA BAHASA PERTENTANGAN PADA KUMPULAN PUISI KAKI PETANI; ODE BAGI PEJALAN KARYA KHOER JURZANI KAJIAN STILISTIKA. Repository.Unmuhjember.Ac.Id, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Norrick, N. R. (2003). Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(9), 1333–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7

Potamias, R. A. (2020). A transformer-based approach to irony and sarcasm detection. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(23), 17309–17320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05102-3

Rafli Haykal, M., Noortyani, R., & Taqwiem, A. (2022). GAYA BAHASA SINDIRAN DALAM NOVEL “O” KARYA EKA KURNIAWAN: SATIRE LANGUAGE STYLE IN THE NOVEL “O” BY EKA KURNIAWAN. LOCANA, 5(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.20527/jl.v5i2.98

Rapp, A. (2013). Isn’t it ironic? Neural Correlates of Irony Comprehension in Schizophrenia. PLoS ONE, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074224

Rapp, A. M., & Wild, B. (2011). Nonliteral Language in Alzheimer Dementia: A Review. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617710001682

Riloff, E., Qadir, A., Surve, P., Silva, L. D., Gilbert, N., & Huang, R. (2013). Sarcasm as Contrast between a Positive Sentiment and Negative Situation.

Ritchie, D. (1993). The development of the C language. ACM Sigplan Notices, Query date: 2024-03-30 04:58:41.

Rossetti, I. (2018). Metaphor comprehension in schizophrenic patients. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00670

Rosso, P. (2018). A survey on author profiling, deception, and irony detection for the Arabic language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12275

Ruch, W. (2018). Broadening humor: Comic styles differentially tap into temperament, character, and ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(Query date: 2024-03-18 10:01:53). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00006

Setyangga, E., Budiana, N., & Toha, M. (2023). Penggunaan Gaya Bahasa Sindiran dalam Konten Channel Youtube Animasi Tekotok Tinjauan Pragmatik. Journal on Education, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Sharma, A. S. (2019). Automatic Detection of Satire in Bangla Documents: A CNN Approach Based on Hybrid Feature Extraction Model. 2019 International Conference on Bangla Speech and Language Processing, ICBSLP 2019, Query date: 2024-05-21 02:33:22. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBSLP47725.2019.201517

Spotorno, N. (2013). What’s behind a P600? Integration Operations during Irony Processing. PLoS ONE, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066839

Suciartini, N. N. A. (2019). ANALISIS BAHASA SATIRE DALAM PERTARUNGAN POLITIK 2019 (Satire Language Analysis in Political 2019). Sirok Bastra, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.37671/sb.v7i1.156

Sukarto, K. A., & Fauziah, F. (2022). Satire and Sarcasm on the “YouTube Got Talent" Video: A Case Study on Skinnyindonesian24 Channel. 5(2).

Sulis, E. (2016). Figurative messages and affect in Twitter: Differences between #irony, #sarcasm and #not. Knowledge-Based Systems, 108(Query date: 2024-05-14 22:31:33), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.05.035

Suryaningsih, L. (2021). Analisis Penggunaan Gaya Bahasa Sarkasme pada Lirik Lagu Mbojo. … (Jurnal Penelitian Dan PKM Bidang Ilmu …, Query date: 2024-02-26 11:29:33.

Sykora, M. (2020). A qualitative analysis of sarcasm, irony and related #hashtags on Twitter. Big Data and Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720972735

Thompson, D. (2016). Emotional responses to irony and emoticons in written language: Evidence from EDA and facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 53(7), 1054–1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12642

Ţurcan, A. (2016). An eye-tracking investigation of written sarcasm comprehension: The roles of familiarity and context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(12), 1867–1893. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000285

Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2012). Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press.

Yanti, L. (2024). Gaya Bahasa dalam Novel Rindu Yang Baik Untuk Kisah Yang Pelik Karya Boy Candra. 8.

Yulianti, A. I., & Firdaus, W. (2019). Ungkapan Keprihatinan dalam “Maklumat Akal Sehat”(Analisis Wacana Kritis terhadap Maklumat Rocky Gerung dkk). Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 8(1), 93-109.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v14i1.7455

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lihat Statistik Jurnal Ranah View MyStat

 

Ranah: jurnal Kajian Bahasa diterbitkan oleh Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa bekerja sama dengan Perkumpulan Pengelola Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajarannya (PPJB-SIP) is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0 

 

©2017a

Sekretariat Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa

Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan

Jalan Daksinapati Barat IV, Rawamangun, Jakarta Timur

Pos-el: jurnalranahbahasa@gmail.com

Telepon: (021) 4706287