VARIASI GAYA BAHASA SINDIRAN DALAM DEBAT KETIGA PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN INDONESIA 2024 (Language Style Variations of Satire In The Third Debate of The 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election)

Alif Irvansyah; Agus Syahrani; Dedy Ari Asfar

doi:10.26499/jk.v21i1.7740

VARIASI GAYA BAHASA SINDIRAN DALAM DEBAT KETIGA PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN INDONESIA 2024 (Language Style Variations of Satire In The Third Debate of The 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election)

Alif Irvansyah, Agus Syahrani, Dedy Ari Asfar

Abstract

Ahead of the 2024 presidential election, there are various political phenomena that occur and cause many pros and cons. One of them is the third presidential debate, which has attracted a lot of public interest. This study aims to provide a description of the use of satirical language styles contained in the third presidential debate in the 2024 general election by using the theory of satirical language styles consisting of six types, namely irony, cynicism, sarcasm, satire, antiphrasis, and inuendo. The method used in this research is a descriptive method with a qualitative research form. The data in this research are all words and sentences containing sarcasm in the third debate of the 2024 Indonesian presidential candidates. The technique used in data collection is the documentary study technique, which utilizes audiovisual and digital materials. The technique used in data analysis is the data reduction technique, which involves identifying, presenting, and describing data in the form of satire language. The results of this study show that there are 24 utterances containing sarcasm language style, which are evenly distributed among all types of sarcasm language style, consisting of six types of sarcasm language style.

Menjelang Pemilihan Presiden 2024, terdapat berbagai fenomena politik yang terjadi dan menimbulkan banyak pro dan kontra. Salah satunya adalah adanya debat presiden ketiga yang banyak mengundang ketertarikan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan deskripsi pemakaian gaya bahasa sindiran yang terdapat dalam debat ketiga calon presiden pada pemilihan umum tahun 2024 dengan menggunakan teori gaya bahasa sindiran yang terdiri atas enam macam, yaitu ironi, sinisme, sarkasme, satire, antifrasis, dan inuendo. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode deskriptif dengan bentuk penelitian kualitatif. Data dalam penelitian ini adalah semua kata dan kalimat yang mengandung gaya bahasa sindiran di dalam debat ketiga calon presiden Indonesia 2024. Teknik yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan data adalah teknik studi dokumenter dengan memanfaatkan audiovisual and digital materials (materi digital dan audiovisual). Teknik yang digunakan dalam analisis data adalah teknik reduksi data, mengidentifikasi data, menyajikan, dan mendeskripsikan data dalam bentuk gaya bahasa sindiran. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 24 tuturan yang mengandung gaya bahasa sindiran yang tersebar ke semua jenis gaya bahasa sindiran yang terdiri atas enam jenis.

Keywords

presidential debate; satire language; political; debat presiden; bahasa sindiran; politik

Full Text:

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Ambarsari, F. C., Gizka, A. F., Zerlinda, N., Putri, N. S. M., Giyanti, M. E. P., & Arum, D. P. (2024). Bahasa Indonesia dalam komunikasi politik : Variasi gaya bahasa calon presiden dalam debat pertama Pilpres 2024. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(2), 5702–5720. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9989

Arisnawati, N. (2020). Gaya bahasa sindiran sebagai bentuk komunikasi tidak langsung dalam bahasa Laiyolo. Medan Makna, 18(2), 136. https://doi.org/10.26499/mm.v18i2.2314

Asfar, D. A. (2015). Kekerabatan dan pemetaan bahasa-bahasa Dayak di Lembah Tayan Hulu. Yogyakarta: Elmatera.

Asfar, D. A. (2019). Ciri-ciri bahasa Melayu Pontianak berbasis korpus Lagu Balek Kampong. tuahtalino, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.26499/tt.v13i1.1474

Audrey, J., Sari, D. S., & Mubarak, K. Z. (2023). Indonesian language diplomacy in the United States of America through the Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing (BIPA) program. LECR, 3(2), p1. https://doi.org/10.22158/lecr.v3n2p1

Ayuningtyas, N. A., & Triyono, S. (2022). Satire language style by Bu Tejo in the short Film “TILIK.” LiNGUA J., 16(2), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v16i2.11355

Bączkowska, A. (2022). Explicit and implicit offensiveness in dialogical film discourse in Bridgit Jones films. Int. Rev. Pragmat., 14(2), 198–225. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01402003

Baulch, E., Matamoros-Fernández, A., & Suwana, F. (2024). Memetic persuasion and WhatsAppification in Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election. New Media & Society, 26(5), 2473–2491. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221088274

Beadle-Brown, J., & Roberts, R. (2019). Challenging the status quo. Commentary on “Mothers’ experiences of the transition of young people with autism spectrum disorder to adult care” (McMinn, Schulz, & Ludlow, 2019). Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 6(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2019.1629333

Best, J. (2021). To Teach and delight: The varieties of learning from fiction. Review of General Psychology, 25(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020977173

Bsharat, A. (2024). Signs in caricature from satire to profound pragmatic discourse: A study on the function of signs and narrative sequences. Migration Letters, 21(S6).

Chigasheva, M. A., Yelizaryeva, M. A., Nagumanova, V. A., & Makushkina, E. A. (2023). Language, politics, and identity: An interdisciplinary investigation of modern political discourse. PDC, 5(2), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2023-5-2-31-45

Clarke, B. (2003). The art of innuendo. Heredity, 90(4), 279–280. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800229

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Third). California: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Fifth). California: SAGE Publications.

Effendy, C., De Vera, R. V. M., Asfar, D. A., Syahrani, A., & Daeng Gs, A. (2021). Being survivors: Therapeutic communication for people living with HIV/AIDS (plwha). Indonesian Journal of Communications Studies, 5(3), 584–599. https://doi.org/10.25139/jsk.v5i3.3838

Fransisca, V. (2023). Analysis of language in its use with peers. Jurnal Sostech, 3(2), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.59188/jurnalsostech.v3i2.645

Harutyunyan, R. (2022). The specificity of language style in media-political discourse. Flhe, 26(1), 39–53. Https://Doi.Org/10.46991/Flhe/2022.26.1.039

Haykal, M. R., Noortyani, R., & Taqwiem, A. (2022). Gaya bahasa sindiran dalam novel “O” karya Eka Kurniawan. Locana, 5(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.20527/jl.v5i2.98

Helberger, N., Araujo, T., & De Vreese, C. H. (2020). Who is the fairest of them all? Public attitudes and expectations regarding automated decision-making. Computer Law & Security Review, 39, 105456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105456

Herfani, F. K., & Manaf, N. A. (2020). Tindak tutur komisif dan ekspresif dalam debat capres-cawapres pada Pilpres 2019. JBS, 8(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.24036/81088710

Ilyas, M., & Putri, M. E. (2020). YouTube channel: An alternative social media to enhance EFL students’ speaking skill. J.OfEngforAcad, 7(1), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.25299/jshmic.2020.vol7(1).4141

Kaltenbacher, M., & Drews, S. (2020). An inconvenient joke? A review of humor in climate change communication. Environmental Communication, 14(6), 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1756888

Keraf, G. (2021). Diksi dan gaya bahasa (16th ed.). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Konopelkina, O., Yashkina, V., Bezrodnykh, I., Polishko, N., & Haidar, V. (2022). Linguistic and cognitive features of English-Language political discourse. SMC, 10(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v10i3.5840

Kotenko, O., Кosharna, N., Chepurna, M., Trebyk, O., & Bakhov, I. (2023). Linguistic and stylistic features of English public speeches. WJEL, 13(4), 56. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n4p56

Kwon, W., Clarke, I., Vaara, E., Mackay, R., & Wodak, R. (2020). Using verbal irony to move on with controversial issues. Organization Science, 31(4), 865–886. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1333

Lacatus, C., & Meibauer, G. (2022). ‘Saying it like it is’: Right-wing populism, international politics, and the performance of authenticity. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24(3), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481221089137

Lafamane, F. (2020, July). KAJIAN STILISTIKA (Komponen Kajian Stilistika). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/5qjm4

Latifah, M. (2022). Irony in Jonathan Stroud’s The Amulet Of Samarkand. Lilics, 1(1), 190–217. https://doi.org/10.18860/lilics.v1i1.2372

Li, M., Liu, H., Wu, B., & Bai, T. (2022). Language style matters: Personality prediction from textual styles learning. 2022 IEEE International Conference on Knowledge Graph (ICKG), 141–148. Orlando, FL, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICKG55886.2022.00025

Mauchand, M., Vergis, N., & Pell, M. D. (2020). Irony, prosody, and social impressions of affective stance. Discourse Processes, 57(2), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2019.1581588

Nasution, F., & Tambunan, E. E. (2022). Language and communication. IJCS, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijcs.v1i1.86

Novidha, F., & Nurhadi. (2022). Language style in the song lyrics “Caution on The Road” karya Tulus; Stylistic Study. IJLLT, 5(4), 151–154. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2022.5.4.18

Pavlycheva, E. D., & Sorokina, E. A. (2022). On some linguistic phenomena in the portrait linguistic personality of a politician. Jour, (4). https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2022-4-1194

Ponton, D. M. (2021). “Never in my life have I heard such a load of absolute nonsense. Wtf.” Political satire on the handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(3), 767–788. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-767-788

Putra, I. M., Asfar, D. A., & Syahrani, A. (2023). Unlocking Melawi Malay medicine mantras: Sound patterns and ecological symbolism of oral literature. REiLA Journal, 5(3), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.31849/reila.v5i3.16017

Reiter, F., & Matthes, J. (2022). “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”: A panel study on the reciprocal effects of negative, dirty, and positive campaigning on political distrust. Mass Communication and Society, 25(5), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1934702

Robert, O. S. (2022). Language as a medium for bridging the gap between philosophy, media, and development. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4107-7.ch003

Romadlani, M. M. I., & Wijana, I. D. P. (2022). The functions of humorous discourse in mind your language. LiNGUA J., 16(2), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v16i2.11528

Rosenblum, M., Schroeder, J., & Gino, F. (2020). Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 75–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000206

Saputra, R. R., Charlina, & Sinaga, M. (2020). Gaya bahasa sindiran dalam debat Acara Indonesia Lawyers Club “Corona : Simalakama Bangsa Kita.” Sastranesia: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.32682/sastranesia.v8i4.1726

Sarli, S. (2023). Analisis penggunaan gaya Bahasa Sarkasme Netizen Di Media Sosial Tiktok. Knowledge, 3(1), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.51878/knowledge.v3i1.2191

Stewart, C. R., & Yap, S. (2020). Low literacy, policy and consumer vulnerability: Are we really doing enough? Int J Consumer Studies, 44(4), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12569

Syaveny, N., & Rani, J. (2022). Language styles in “The Ron Clark Story” movie: A sosiolinguistic analysis. JCC, 6(3), 168–176. https://doi.org/10.22216/curricula.v6i3.768

Tiorida, N., Charlina, C., & Elmustian, E. (2024). Analisis gaya bahasa sinisme pada novel Gendut? Siapa Takut! Karya Alnira. Jiip, 7(5), 4600–4607. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i5.4409

Wirawan, F., Syaftinentias, W., Masran, S., Eka Putri, N. Y., & Wiyan Drazit, W. (2023). An analysis of language style used by the main character in “Free Guy” Movie. EER, 4(3), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.33559/eer.v4i3.1451

Yates, L. (2021). Prefigurative politics and social movement strategy: The roles of prefiguration in the reproduction, mobilisation and coordination of movements. Political Studies, 69(4), 1033–1052. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720936046

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v21i1.7740