KONSTELASI WACANA FATIS DALAM STRUKTUR WACANA PERCAKAPAN MASYARAKAT JAWA (The Constellation of Phatic Discourse in The Conversational Discourse Structure of Javanese Society)
Abstract
Bahasa dalam modus sosial direalisasikan dalam bentuk wacana fatis, yaitu sebuah wacana yang tidak penting informasinya, tetapi penting sebagai sarana untuk memelihara hubungan sosial. Dalam praktik komunikasi di masyarakat, pada umumnya wacana fatis digunakan dalam fase pembuka dan penutup (fase marginal) percakapan. Berangkat dari asumsi itu peneliti berhipotesis bahwa wacana fatis sangat mungkin hadir dan berkonstelasi dalam setiap fase interaksi bergantung kebutuhan relasional dan konteks percakapan. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan konstelasi wacana fatis dalam struktur wacana percakapan masyarakat Jawa. Data dalam penelitian ini ialah wacana fatis sebagai satuan pengisi wacana percakapan/interaktif. Latar pengambilan data dipusatkan di Desa Pirikan, Kecamatan Secang, Kabupaten Magelang pada Januari s.d. Juni 2020. Responden yang terlibat dalam penelitian berjumlah 17 orang. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan teknik observasi nonpartisipan. Selama pengumpulan data berlangsung, peneliti juga melakukan perekaman, pencatatan, dan pentranslasian. Data penelitian ini dianalisis dengan metode padan referensial, padan pragmatis, dan metode agih. Berdasakan penelitian, wacana fatis hadir dan berkonstelasi dalam setiap fase interaksi baik pembuka, tengah, penutup. Wacana fatis yang berkonstelasi dalam struktur wacana percakapan masyarakat Jawa memiliki lima fungsi, antara lain: propitiatory, exploratory, initiatory, space/pause fillers, mitigatory, dan consolidatory. Konstelasi fungsi-fungsi tersebut dalam struktur percakapan pada akhirnya digunakan untuk mencapai konsensus interaksi (working consensus). Hasil penelitian ini mengukuhkan tesis para peneliti terdahulu bahwa pada umumnya wacana fatis berkonstelasi pada fase marginal dan membuktikan bahwa wacana fatis dapat muncul dan berkonstelasi pada fase tengah interaksi.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
al-Qinai, J. B. S. (2022). Translating phatic expressions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.21.1.02qin
Arimi, S. (1998). Basa-basi dalam masyarakat bahasa Indonesia (Universitas Gadjah Mada). Universitas Gadjah Mada. Retrieved from http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/3105
Asmara, R., Wijana, I. D. P., & Sulistyowati, S. (2023). Bentuk wacana fatis dalam interaksi sosial masyarakat Jawa (Forms of phatic discourse in the Javanese social interaction). Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 9(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v9i1.12993
Baryadi, I. P. (2001). Konsep-konsep pokok dalam analisis wacana. Widyaparwa, 57, 1–23.
Chen, J. (2017). Research trends in intercultural pragmatics. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 37(4), 530–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2016.1204903
Coupland, J., Coupland, N., & Robinson, J. D. (1992). “How are you?”: Negotiating phatic communion. Language in Society, 21(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500015268
Cruz, M. P. (2013). An integrative proposal to teach the pragmatics of phatic communion in ESL classes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0005
Garner, A. M., & Sharma, B. K. (2022). The social, intercultural, and transactional nature of small talk in the second language classroom. TESOL Communications, 1(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.46451/tc.20220202
Gunarwan, A. (2007). Pragmatik: Teori dan kajian Nusantara. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya.
Hadiati, C. (2017). Ora lunyu dalane mbok?: The Use of Phatic Expressions in Traditional Selling and Buying. Celt: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching & Literature, 17(2), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.24167/celt.v18i2.762
Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4. ed). London: Routledge.
Iversen, C., Flinkfeldt, M., Tuncer, S., & Laurier, E. (2022). The uses of small talk in social work: Weather as a resource for informally pursuing institutional tasks. Qualitative Social Work, 21(6), 1043–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/14733250221124218
Jaworski, A. (2000). Silence and small talk. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk. Harlow, England ; New York: Longman.
Jin, Y. (2018). Small talk in medical conversations: Data from China. Journal of Pragmatics, 134, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.011
Jumanto. (2014). Phatic communication: How English native speakers create ties of union. American Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 9–16.
Kendon, A. (2009). Kinesic components of multimodal utterances. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35(2), 36. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v35i2.3510
Korta, K. (2008). Malinowski and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(10), 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.006
Laver, J. (1975). Communicative functions of phatic communion. In A. Kendon (Ed.), Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction. The Hague: Mouton [u.a.].
Maíz-Arévalo, C. (2017). ‘Small talk is not cheap’: Phatic computer-mediated communication in intercultural classes. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(5), 432–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1304423
Mak, B. C. N., & Chui, H. L. (2013). A cultural approach to small talk: A double-edged sword of sociocultural reality during socialization into the workplace. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 8(2), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2012.753078
Malinowski, B. (1923). In C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards (Eds.), The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. London: Routledge & Keagan Paul Ltd.
Márquez-Reiter, R., & Placencia, M. E. (2005). Spanish pragmatics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mattar, N., & Wachsmuth, I. (2012). Small talk is more than chit-chat. In B. Glimm & A. Krüger (Eds.), KI 2012: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (pp. 119–130). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33347-7_11
Maynard, D. W., & Hudak, P. L. (2008). Small talk, high stakes: Interactional disattentiveness in the context of prosocial doctor-patient interaction. Language in Society, 37(5), 661–688. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404508080986
Mey, J. (2009). Concise encyclopedia of pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Rahardi, K. (2018). Konstelasi kefatisan dalam teks-teks natural religius dengan latar belakang kultur spesifik (Phatic constellation in the Indonesian natural religious texts with specific culture background). In K. E. Sukamto (Ed.), Prosiding Kongres Internasional Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia 2018 (pp. 274–279). Manokwari: Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia. Retrieved from http://repository.usd.ac.id/31872/1/4787_KIMLI%2B2018.pdf
Rahardi, K. (2019). Contexts as the determining roles of Javanese phatic ‘monggo’: Culture-specific pragmatics perspective. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 5(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.24235/ileal.v5i1.5035
Rahardi, R. K. (2016). Manifestasi wujud dan makna pragmatik kefatisan berbahasa dalam ranah pendidikan. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra, 15(2), 226. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15206
Rahardi, R. K. (2022). Triadicities of Indonesian Phatic functions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(12), 2641–2650. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1212.22
Rigilano, M. J. (2022). The decline of phatic efficiency. Postmodern Culture, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2022.0003
Schneider, K. P., & Schröder, A. (2023). Small talk across Englishes: A focus on Namibia. Journal of Pragmatics, 213, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.05.012
Senft, G. (2009). Phatic communion. In G. Senft, J.-O. Östman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights (Vol. 2, pp. 226–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hoph.2.20sen
Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa: Pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistis. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26499/jk.v21i1.8152
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Kandai

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Kandai Indexed By















KANTOR BAHASA SULAWESI TENGGARA
View MyStat
Jalan Haluoleo, Kompleks Bumi Praja, Anduonohu, Kendari 93231
Telepon(0401) 3135289, 3135287
pos-el: kandaisultra@gmail.com







