FROM “SKIBIDI” TO “RIZZ”: SPEECH ACTS AND CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURES IN DIGITAL LANGUAGE ON TIKTOK
Abstract
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan jenis tindak tutur dan implikatur percakapan dalam bahasa digital pada TikTok Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis pragmatik terhadap 20 tuturan yang bersumber dari caption dan kolom komentar TikTok yang memuat leksikon populer, seperti “skibidi”, “Rizz”, “sigma”, “no cap”, “bussin”, “slay”, “W”, “L”, dan “NPC”. Data dianalisis melalui identifikasi konteks, klasifikasi tindak tutur berdasarkan taksonomi Searle, analisis maksim percakapan Grice, dan interpretasi fungsi pragmatik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak tutur ekspresif paling dominan (45%), diikuti asertif (30%), direktif (15%), dan komisif (10%). Maksim cara dan relevansi paling sering dimanfaatkan atau dilanggar melalui tuturan yang bersifat eliptis, metaforis, absurd, dan bergantung pada pengetahuan budaya digital bersama. Implikatur yang dihasilkan berfungsi dalam pembentukan identitas komunal, pembedaan anggota dan bukan anggota komunitas, serta efisiensi komunikasi digital. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa leksikon populer dalam bahasa digital tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai unsur leksikal, tetapi juga sebagai sumber daya pragmatik dalam membangun makna dan relasi sosial di TikTok.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198
Anhar, A., Khoirunnisaa, K., Septianti, L., & Asmawati, M. (2024). Pengaruh TikTok terhadap perkembangan bahasa di kalangan Generasi Alpha. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(5), 6341–6346. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i5.1994
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
Fatmasari, A. P., Wardhani, T., Roronias, N. A. A., Oemara, R. P., & Nasywan, F. A. (2025). The influence of TikTok social media on the emergence of slang language used by Gen Alpha. KIRANA: Social Science Journal, 2(3), 100—106. https://doi.org/10.61579/kirana.v2i3.318
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Holtgraves, T. (2024). Emoji, speech acts, and perceived communicative success. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 43(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X231200450
Höfrová, A., Balidemaj, V., & Small, M. A. (2024). A systematic literature review of education for Generation Alpha. Discover Education, 3, 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00218-3
Marwanti, A. A., Hidayati, D. S. D., Yan, H. Z. Z., Arasy, M. H., Arianto, N. R., Febrianti, N. V., & Sholihatin, E. (2024). Analisis semantik ragam bahasa gaul oleh Gen Alpha pada aplikasi TikTok MRCI.TV. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i04.21115
Melissa, P., Siregar, M. B. N., Shakira, F. M., Haz, L., & Rangkuti, R. (2024). Sociolinguistic study: Variation of slang words between Gen Z and Gen Alpha. Philosophica: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.35473/po.v7i2.3545
Oxford Languages. (2023). Word of the Year 2023: Rizz. Oxford University Press. https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2023/
Prima, B. K., Soraya, N., & Rosalinah, Y. (2025). Sociolinguistic perspective on digital communication: Understanding Gen Alpha language use in TikTok. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.886
Scott, K. (2018). “Hashtags work everywhere”: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags. Discourse, Context & Media, 22, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.002
Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
Su, R., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Conversational implicature: A diachronic cognitive pragmatic approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 867. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05248-2
Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773064
Tan, H., & Yu, Y. (2024). A study on identification of youth identity through a gender lens in network buzzwords: A critical discourse analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 130. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02618-0
Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213
Zappavigna, M. (2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.








