FROM “SKIBIDI” TO “RIZZ”: SPEECH ACTS AND CONVERSATIONAL IMPLICATURES IN DIGITAL LANGUAGE ON TIKTOK

Vivih Karlina, Agus Sudrajat, Nurul Asma, Halimah Halimah

Abstract

This study aims to describe speech acts and conversational implicatures in digital language on Indonesian TikTok. The study employs a qualitative approach using pragmatic analysis of 20 utterances drawn from TikTok captions and comment sections containing popular lexical items, such as “skibidi”, “Rizz”, “sigma”, “no cap”, “bussin”, “slay”, “W”, “L”, and “NPC”. The data were analyzed through contextual identification, classification of speech acts based on Searle’s taxonomy, analysis of Gricean conversational maxims, and interpretation of pragmatic functions. The findings show that expressive speech acts are the most dominant (45%), followed by assertives (30%), directives (15%), and commissives (10%). The maxims of manner and relevance are most frequently exploited or flouted through elliptical, metaphorical, absurd, and culturally embedded utterances. The resulting implicatures function to construct communal identity, distinguish community members from non-members, and facilitate communicative efficiency. These findings demonstrate that popular lexical items in digital language function not only as lexical elements but also as pragmatic resources for constructing meaning and social relations on TikTok.

Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan jenis tindak tutur dan implikatur percakapan dalam bahasa digital pada TikTok Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis pragmatik terhadap 20 tuturan yang bersumber dari caption dan kolom komentar TikTok yang memuat leksikon populer, seperti “skibidi”, “Rizz”, “sigma”, “no cap”, “bussin”, “slay”, “W”, “L”, dan “NPC”. Data dianalisis melalui identifikasi konteks, klasifikasi tindak tutur berdasarkan taksonomi Searle, analisis maksim percakapan Grice, dan interpretasi fungsi pragmatik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tindak tutur ekspresif paling dominan (45%), diikuti asertif (30%), direktif (15%), dan komisif (10%). Maksim cara dan relevansi paling sering dimanfaatkan atau dilanggar melalui tuturan yang bersifat eliptis, metaforis, absurd, dan bergantung pada pengetahuan budaya digital bersama. Implikatur yang dihasilkan berfungsi dalam pembentukan identitas komunal, pembedaan anggota dan bukan anggota komunitas, serta efisiensi komunikasi digital. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa leksikon populer dalam bahasa digital tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai unsur leksikal, tetapi juga sebagai sumber daya pragmatik dalam membangun makna dan relasi sosial di TikTok.

Keywords

conversational implicature; digital language; pragmatics; speech acts; TikTok

Full Text:

PDF

References

Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198

Anhar, A., Khoirunnisaa, K., Septianti, L., & Asmawati, M. (2024). Pengaruh TikTok terhadap perkembangan bahasa di kalangan Generasi Alpha. Indo-MathEdu Intellectuals Journal, 5(5), 6341–6346. https://doi.org/10.54373/imeij.v5i5.1994

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Fatmasari, A. P., Wardhani, T., Roronias, N. A. A., Oemara, R. P., & Nasywan, F. A. (2025). The influence of TikTok social media on the emergence of slang language used by Gen Alpha. KIRANA: Social Science Journal, 2(3), 100—106. https://doi.org/10.61579/kirana.v2i3.318

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press.

Holtgraves, T. (2024). Emoji, speech acts, and perceived communicative success. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 43(1), 30–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X231200450

Höfrová, A., Balidemaj, V., & Small, M. A. (2024). A systematic literature review of education for Generation Alpha. Discover Education, 3, 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00218-3

Marwanti, A. A., Hidayati, D. S. D., Yan, H. Z. Z., Arasy, M. H., Arianto, N. R., Febrianti, N. V., & Sholihatin, E. (2024). Analisis semantik ragam bahasa gaul oleh Gen Alpha pada aplikasi TikTok MRCI.TV. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.23969/jp.v9i04.21115

Melissa, P., Siregar, M. B. N., Shakira, F. M., Haz, L., & Rangkuti, R. (2024). Sociolinguistic study: Variation of slang words between Gen Z and Gen Alpha. Philosophica: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Budaya, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.35473/po.v7i2.3545

Oxford Languages. (2023). Word of the Year 2023: Rizz. Oxford University Press. https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2023/

Prima, B. K., Soraya, N., & Rosalinah, Y. (2025). Sociolinguistic perspective on digital communication: Understanding Gen Alpha language use in TikTok. Golden Ratio of Data in Summary, 5(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.52970/grdis.v5i1.886

Scott, K. (2018). “Hashtags work everywhere”: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags. Discourse, Context & Media, 22, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.002

Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837

Su, R., & Zhang, Y. (2025). Conversational implicature: A diachronic cognitive pragmatic approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 867. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05248-2

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773064

Tan, H., & Yu, Y. (2024). A study on identification of youth identity through a gender lens in network buzzwords: A critical discourse analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 130. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02618-0

Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.213

Zappavigna, M. (2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948

Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.